We choose smaller, more immediate rewards over greater ones that we need to wait for
Would you prefer $100 now or $120 in a year? But what about $100 in 4 years or $120 in 5? Despite the same time gap, did your choices differ?
Green, Fry & Myerson (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological science.
Impact
The study
The studies
36 children, young adults and adults were asked to choose between a delayed reward of $1,000 and a number of smaller ones now.
All were quick to accept smaller rewards now over a larger delayed one. The longer the delay, the less perceived value the reward had, so $1,000 next week felt equal to $900 today but $1,000 in five years felt like $600 today.
36 children, young adults and adults were asked to choose between a delayed reward of $1,000 and a number of smaller ones now.
All were quick to accept smaller rewards now over a larger delayed one. The longer the delay, the less perceived value the reward had, so $1,000 next week felt equal to $900 today but $1,000 in five years felt like $600 today.
Green, Fry & Myerson (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological science.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Embrace the power of now.
Immediate gains are valued more greatly than those far off. Similarly, far-off costs seem less painful. Amazon heighten the immediate gain by taking a hit now, for longer term business payoff.
Where in your business can you capitalize upon 'the now'?
Prevent impulsive financial or health decisions by:
• Reframing future rewards around time (by stating a specific date) or by surfacing the painful zero outcomes of short-term choices (Wu & He, 2012).
• Goal Priming. Painting a vivid, personal, emotional picture of someone's future reality will boost their ability to make longer-term decisions now.
Dissuade from inferior choices today with a lock-in for tomorrow
This is when a choice now locks in a set of future inferior outcomes, aggregating any gains and forcing a stronger consideration of less impulsive choices.
Boundary conditions
Future questions
We choose smaller, more immediate rewards over greater ones that we need to wait for
Would you prefer $100 now or $120 in a year? But what about $100 in 4 years or $120 in 5? Despite the same time gap, did your choices differ?
Green, Fry & Myerson (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological science.
The study
Impact
The study
The studies
36 children, young adults and adults were asked to choose between a delayed reward of $1,000 and a number of smaller ones now.
All were quick to accept smaller rewards now over a larger delayed one. The longer the delay, the less perceived value the reward had, so $1,000 next week felt equal to $900 today but $1,000 in five years felt like $600 today.
36 children, young adults and adults were asked to choose between a delayed reward of $1,000 and a number of smaller ones now.
All were quick to accept smaller rewards now over a larger delayed one. The longer the delay, the less perceived value the reward had, so $1,000 next week felt equal to $900 today but $1,000 in five years felt like $600 today.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Embrace the power of now.
Immediate gains are valued more greatly than those far off. Similarly, far-off costs seem less painful. Amazon heighten the immediate gain by taking a hit now, for longer term business payoff.
Where in your business can you capitalize upon 'the now'?
Prevent impulsive financial or health decisions by:
• Reframing future rewards around time (by stating a specific date) or by surfacing the painful zero outcomes of short-term choices (Wu & He, 2012).
• Goal Priming. Painting a vivid, personal, emotional picture of someone's future reality will boost their ability to make longer-term decisions now.
Dissuade from inferior choices today with a lock-in for tomorrow
This is when a choice now locks in a set of future inferior outcomes, aggregating any gains and forcing a stronger consideration of less impulsive choices.
Boundary conditions
Future questions
Green, Fry & Myerson (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological science.
We choose smaller, more immediate rewards over greater ones that we need to wait for
Would you prefer $100 now or $120 in a year? But what about $100 in 4 years or $120 in 5? Despite the same time gap, did your choices differ?
The study
36 children, young adults and adults were asked to choose between a delayed reward of $1,000 and a number of smaller ones now.
All were quick to accept smaller rewards now over a larger delayed one. The longer the delay, the less perceived value the reward had, so $1,000 next week felt equal to $900 today but $1,000 in five years felt like $600 today.
Green, Fry & Myerson (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological science.
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter