We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Though it has its benefits, our instinctive tendency to preserve mental ‘bandwidth’ and make fast decisions can instead lead us to poor ones.
Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan & Pollack (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Field experiments to reduce crime … in Chicago. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Impact
The study
The studies
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan & Pollack (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Field experiments to reduce crime … in Chicago. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Whilst we all like to think we make rational, optimal decisions, sometimes, our impulses get the better of us.
In an attempt to preserve our cognitive capacity, we make what’s called fast, reactionary “System 1” judgements.
These might not be very good at all for us.
Let me explain.
Consider you’re stressed out after a long day, and launch your favourite social media app to unwind. You see someone sharing a wild conspiracy theory that you know to be untrue.
You’re angry, and quickly write out a frustrated comment that criticises this person, using strong language that would offend.
At this point, hitting “send” would cause a lot of damage you can’t come back from.
This is where our slower “System 2” thinking becomes vital.
Here, reflective thought is the order of the day. It’s more cognitively-expensive to think about what the deeper implications of hitting “send” would be. However, now would be a good time to do so.
Social media apps are increasingly providing us opportunities to do just this. Banks could do the same. “Are you sure you want to withdraw all your savings?”
Providing users a “cooling off period” for impactful moments now can allow for better decisions that help us more in our future.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Add a little friction.
We constantly weigh up effort vs rewards, so seeing one long sign-up form can lead us to make a fast system-one decision not to do so.
A process that’s Chunked, features reflective Goal Primes and clearly shows the product benefits will work better.
Build in reflective periods for big decisions.
Knee-jerk, short-term decisions can harm our longer-term goals. E.g., financial firms can help us make smarter decisions about withdrawing all our savings by building in a reflective delay, especially when such decisions conflict with our prior Commitments and goals.
Boundary conditions
Future questions
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Though it has its benefits, our instinctive tendency to preserve mental ‘bandwidth’ and make fast decisions can instead lead us to poor ones.
Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan & Pollack (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Field experiments to reduce crime … in Chicago. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
The study
Impact
The study
The studies
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Add a little friction.
We constantly weigh up effort vs rewards, so seeing one long sign-up form can lead us to make a fast system-one decision not to do so.
A process that’s Chunked, features reflective Goal Primes and clearly shows the product benefits will work better.
Build in reflective periods for big decisions.
Knee-jerk, short-term decisions can harm our longer-term goals. E.g., financial firms can help us make smarter decisions about withdrawing all our savings by building in a reflective delay, especially when such decisions conflict with our prior Commitments and goals.
Boundary conditions
Future questions
Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan & Pollack (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Field experiments to reduce crime … in Chicago. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Whilst we all like to think we make rational, optimal decisions, sometimes, our impulses get the better of us.
In an attempt to preserve our cognitive capacity, we make what’s called fast, reactionary “System 1” judgements.
These might not be very good at all for us.
Let me explain.
Consider you’re stressed out after a long day, and launch your favourite social media app to unwind. You see someone sharing a wild conspiracy theory that you know to be untrue.
You’re angry, and quickly write out a frustrated comment that criticises this person, using strong language that would offend.
At this point, hitting “send” would cause a lot of damage you can’t come back from.
This is where our slower “System 2” thinking becomes vital.
Here, reflective thought is the order of the day. It’s more cognitively-expensive to think about what the deeper implications of hitting “send” would be. However, now would be a good time to do so.
Social media apps are increasingly providing us opportunities to do just this. Banks could do the same. “Are you sure you want to withdraw all your savings?”
Providing users a “cooling off period” for impactful moments now can allow for better decisions that help us more in our future.
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Though it has its benefits, our instinctive tendency to preserve mental ‘bandwidth’ and make fast decisions can instead lead us to poor ones.
The study
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
Heller, Shah, Guryan, Ludwig, Mullainathan & Pollack (2017). Thinking, fast and slow? Field experiments to reduce crime … in Chicago. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Whilst we all like to think we make rational, optimal decisions, sometimes, our impulses get the better of us.
In an attempt to preserve our cognitive capacity, we make what’s called fast, reactionary “System 1” judgements.
These might not be very good at all for us.
Let me explain.
Consider you’re stressed out after a long day, and launch your favourite social media app to unwind. You see someone sharing a wild conspiracy theory that you know to be untrue.
You’re angry, and quickly write out a frustrated comment that criticises this person, using strong language that would offend.
At this point, hitting “send” would cause a lot of damage you can’t come back from.
This is where our slower “System 2” thinking becomes vital.
Here, reflective thought is the order of the day. It’s more cognitively-expensive to think about what the deeper implications of hitting “send” would be. However, now would be a good time to do so.
Social media apps are increasingly providing us opportunities to do just this. Banks could do the same. “Are you sure you want to withdraw all your savings?”
Providing users a “cooling off period” for impactful moments now can allow for better decisions that help us more in our future.
Money and short-term thinking are a match made in hell, leading to spontaneous decisions that can cause great harm. With their Vault, Coinbase have a solution to this problem, slowing down decision-making with a few extra steps...
Read moreScarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter