We tend to favour our group over others
Our evolutionary need to belong creates an irrational preference for our own group, causing us to behave uncooperatively and harming broader cohesion.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Impact
The study
The studies
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
In-Group favouritism can take many forms.
For instance, designers might feel they are the out-group in a meeting dominated by engineers, creating a sense that they're either not as welcomed or have opinions that aren't as valued. Who might be feeling excluded in your projects and meetings?
Turn “Us vs Them” into “We”.
Broaden the perception of group boundaries by cooperating with the out-group in shared activities (Gaertner et al., 1990). Which situations can you create that promote collaboration?
Actively use the benefits of your outgroup.
We tend to evaluate the work of our own group as better and more creative than it really is. However, by enlisting the aid of an out-group, you may have an accurate assessment of the actual creative value (Adarves‐Yorno, 2008).
Be careful with unconscious bias.
Groups can be formed by meaningless reasons but also by our own pre-conceived notions or bias. What might be some of the reasons you or others use to place someone in an out-group? How might you raise this in a way to bring disconnected groups together?
Boundary conditions
Future questions
We tend to favour our group over others
Our evolutionary need to belong creates an irrational preference for our own group, causing us to behave uncooperatively and harming broader cohesion.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
The study
Impact
The study
The studies
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
In-Group favouritism can take many forms.
For instance, designers might feel they are the out-group in a meeting dominated by engineers, creating a sense that they're either not as welcomed or have opinions that aren't as valued. Who might be feeling excluded in your projects and meetings?
Turn “Us vs Them” into “We”.
Broaden the perception of group boundaries by cooperating with the out-group in shared activities (Gaertner et al., 1990). Which situations can you create that promote collaboration?
Actively use the benefits of your outgroup.
We tend to evaluate the work of our own group as better and more creative than it really is. However, by enlisting the aid of an out-group, you may have an accurate assessment of the actual creative value (Adarves‐Yorno, 2008).
Be careful with unconscious bias.
Groups can be formed by meaningless reasons but also by our own pre-conceived notions or bias. What might be some of the reasons you or others use to place someone in an out-group? How might you raise this in a way to bring disconnected groups together?
Boundary conditions
Future questions
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
We tend to favour our group over others
Our evolutionary need to belong creates an irrational preference for our own group, causing us to behave uncooperatively and harming broader cohesion.
The study
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter