Barrier

Overcome Reactance

How can we best deliver difficult change in a sensitive, nuanced way that limits reactance and lasting brand damage?

Framing

Framing

Conversion

We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented

You may be just delivering the change as 'inevitable' or 'necessary', and a lack of intentional reframing will hurt public perceptions.

Instead of framing the change as E.g. merely a cost-cutting exercise, you might consider alternatives, such as a breakthrough in innovation or process.

Going further, consider reframes that tie in with your own broader brand values or goals.

How is this change currently being delivered?
What are some alternative frames for 'the why' behind the change?
How might these best align with brand values and expectations?
Authority

Authority

Conversion

We have a strong tendency to comply with those in charge

Consider enlisting a role model in your industry or organisation to help deliver the difficult news.

Lean into leading industry standards to adopt or co-create as a broader part of the change, in order to help others see the change as progression or as something safe.

You might need a different authority figure to deliver news internally vs externally, based on your audience and message.

Who might this role model be and why might they be a good fit, in the eyes of others?
What new industry standards can you adopt or co-create to offset reactance?
Publicly, who might be a good fit for a sensitive campaign to share the changes coming? Why?
Mere Exposure Effect

Mere Exposure Effect

Conversion

We like things more as they become more familiar to us

Take small steps. When change is delivered all at once, it can create discomfort that can reduce acceptance in the long run.

Increase exposure. As understanding and acceptance of the change sinks in, consider how you might share information about what the change looks like, either in more detail, or with more regularity in the run up to key milestones.

Allow plenty of time. Ensure that you don't rush through the process of delivering the news. People need ample time to understand, process and adjust to the forthcoming reality. This also provides you more moments to explain 'the why' behind the decision.

What could a gentle introduction to the change look like?
How might you break down the change into smaller steps with increasing exposure or regularity?
Are you allowing enough time for the changes to sink in?
Curiosity Effect

Curiosity Effect

Conversion

We're driven to seek missing info that closes our knowledge gap

An education opportunity. Use the change as a unique opportunity to help evolve others' thinking of the problem you're both facing and solving.

Challenge conventional thinking. Open-ended questions in your comms can help people think twice about existing judgements.

E.g. "Does good palm oil exist?" will make readers think that it doesn't, but they'll then be curious to find out if indeed it could…

Be playful. Confidence in your messaging is important. If you're able to clearly explain the benefits of the change, you can start to elicit playful curiosity in your campaigns.

"Ever heard of sustainable palm oil? It's way better for the earth than other oils…"

What new insight could sit at the core of the change you're making?
How might this insight sit at odds to current thinking?
How might you playfully explore the gap in others' knowledge?
Storyteller Bias

Storyteller Bias

Branding

We’re more persuaded by and better recall those who tell stories

Information delivered in its pure form leaves a lot to the imagination. Don't take this risk. ​Paint a picture of the why behind the change in a way that feels emotionally-relatable.

A good story has the power to challenge the status quo. If you're doing things differently, how might you actively show that you're going against the flow for new or unexpected reasons? There is the opportunity to be a leader here.

Make sure that the way you tell the story aligns with how you're perceived publicly, leaning in to the goals or standards you hold as an organisation. By doing so, you're using familiarity to offset discomfort and reactance.

What's the exciting story behind the change?
How can it challenge convention?
How might it align with brand values?
Fluency Shortcut

Fluency Shortcut

Branding

Statements that are easier to understand are more believable

​Be concise.

Reduce your sentences. Shorten paragraph lengths or support them with clear headings for quick scanning.

Consider simplifying or providing more info if required.

The longer your messages are, the simpler your language should be. We get tired and intolerant fast.

Can you say it more concisely?
Where might you be using terms that people don't understand?
What's the total level of info shared across the whole change?
Halo Effect

Halo Effect

Branding

We incorrectly transfer judgements of known attributes onto other unrelated or unknown ones

Harness your other attributes

When making a big change, there is still a lot in the business that's staying constant.

Lean on positive partnerships

Strengthen close ties with other organisations that allow you to celebrate your unique successes and values, despite the change.

Our identity in part is a product of the company we keep.

Offset the bad by doing more good

If the change you're making will have negative consequences, consider other areas of the business where you can work hard to balance things out.

How can you highlight your consistent brand values both internally and externally?
What positive partnerships can you foster?
What good can you do that champions who you are and what others uniquely enjoy about you?
Devil Effect

Devil Effect

Branding

Our perception of a single negative attribute unfairly bleeds into other unrelated areas

Don't shy away from reality

If you're making a difficult change, it's important to prepare for the worst. People will see the worst in what you're doing and unfairly map it onto broader judgements of your company's values and unrelated aspects of your product quality.

Pre-mortem the negative outcomes

What's the worst possible consequences of the change? How might brand judgements worsen?
What reputational damage could be hardest to repair?

Get it out in the open before it happens.

Build a campaign against this

For each of these negative consequences, consider how you might build a campaign that provides clear, even optimistic and well-thought-out answers to such criticisms.

Are you avoiding the consequences of your proposed change?
How might you surface all the possible negative outcomes?
For each, how might you prepare a mitigating answer or solution?

Checklist. I've...

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What's Cooking?

New Cheat Sheet

New "Overcoming Reactance" Cheat Sheet
New "Overcoming Reactance" Cheat Sheet
This week

New Cheat Sheet

New "Organisational Change" Cheat Sheet
New "Organisational Change" Cheat Sheet
This week

New Nugget In The Wild

How Hismile limit product access to create excitement, sales & deep brand loyalty
How Hismile limit product access to create excitement, sales & deep brand loyalty
This week

New Pairing

A Monzo case study on saving refunds by default
A Monzo case study on saving refunds by default
This week

New Nugget

Refund Effect (2024)
Refund Effect (2024)
This week

Improvement

New Nugget 2.0 schematic
New Nugget 2.0 schematic
This week

New Nugget In The Wild

How Experian's CreditLock creates calm with well-designed control
How Experian's CreditLock creates calm with well-designed control
This week

New Cheat Sheet

New "Overcoming Status Quo" Cheat Sheet
New "Overcoming Status Quo" Cheat Sheet
This week

Improvement

Simplified navigation
Simplified navigation
This week

Improvement

After ten years, just who is behind Coglode?
After ten years, just who is behind Coglode?
This week

Feature

Interactive Defaults Tool released
Interactive Defaults Tool released
This week

Coglode Live

Defaults Live video and deck now available
Defaults Live video and deck now available
This week